Is The Pathfinder Too "Conservative" After the "Radical" ARMADA? - Nissan Armada Forum: Armada & Infiniti QX56 Forums
View Poll Results: Is The Pathfinder Too "Conservative" After the "Radical" ARMADA?
I don't know. 1 2.33%
I think Nissan is becoming more "conservative" in general. 3 6.98%
Not for a mainstream mid-sized SUV with global sales potential. 19 44.19%
The Pathfinder should have been a more performance oriented alternative to the Armada, with an optional Endurance V8, not just slower and smaller. 20 46.51%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 18 (permalink) Old 02-19-2005, 08:44 PM Thread Starter
SHIFT_Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Is The Pathfinder Too "Conservative" After the "Radical" ARMADA?

It's hard to argue with the sub-$28,000 MSRP of the Pathfinder XE 4X4 (unless you're looking at Nissan's own Titan) but it strikes me that pricier Pathfinder SE Offroad and LE models fall too close to the pricing of the industry leading pricing of the Armada SE.

Having said that, I can honestly say that the Pathfinder has leapfrogged Toyota's 4Runner and the rest of the mid-sized SUV class.

Last edited by redzed; 02-19-2005 at 08:59 PM.
redzed is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 (permalink) Old 03-14-2005, 06:17 PM
SHIFT_Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I think they should of gave the Nissan Path more HP and TQ Or delete it out of the system, and Give different engine options and trims to the Pathfinder Armada to lower the price. The X-tera could be the lead Mid-size suv for Nissan.

But i think the name Pathfinder and what it stand for is what keeps it alive, you say Armada and they say what is that and who makes it.

Last edited by Big O; 03-14-2005 at 06:20 PM.
Big O is offline  
post #3 of 18 (permalink) Old 03-14-2005, 07:23 PM
SHIFT_Hardcore
 
adjmcloon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I Like it

I think they pretty much hit the mark. The styling is very cool, and it still looks like a pathfinder. Most power in it's class, and that smooth Nissan tranny. I'd say it's win/win!
adjmcloon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-21-2005, 03:23 PM
SHIFT_Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Pathfinder isn't really any slower than the 'Mada.

divide the weight by the lbs ft of torque, and then do the same calculation for hp for both vehicles. tells you how many pounds there are for every hp and lb-ft of torque. Which is a pretty reliable indication of performance to compare any vehicle against.

Pathfinder comes ahead on HP, Mada on torque. Which tells you they're pretty evenly matched - you'd just have to use the revs a little more on the Pathfinder to keep up. 'Mada has a little more low end grunt, but runs out of breath a little most in the higher revs.

Mada is 1000 lbs heavier than the Pathfinder - almost 1/3rd heaver, so the fact that the weight cancels out the extra power shouldn't come as a big surprise.

Last edited by A1ex; 08-22-2005 at 12:06 PM.
A1ex is offline  
post #5 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2005, 12:57 AM
SHIFT_Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Pathfinders rule

Last week just for fun i raced a Titan and won. I think the Pathfinders are faster and nicer than the Armada for that we would have to see. I chose the pathfinder over the Armada cuz for size and i felt it could better suffice my needs. So far it has by far. People always mistake my Pathfinder for an Armada at first. Most agree that its nicer too. But thats a matter of opinion. I also sounded off my Path agains an Armada running 12 JLW7 with the same amp as mine. Mine sounded better and im only running 2 12" JL W6. See the pathfinder even sounds better.
lol
Much love Armada owners
GUAM PATH is offline  
post #6 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2005, 01:06 AM
SHIFT_Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1ex
Pathfinder isn't really any slower than the 'Mada.

divide the weight by the lbs ft of torque, and then do the same calculation for hp for both vehicles. tells you how many pounds there are for every hp and lb-ft of torque. Which is a pretty reliable indication of performance to compare any vehicle against.

Pathfinder comes ahead on HP, Mada on torque. Which tells you they're pretty evenly matched - you'd just have to use the revs a little more on the Pathfinder to keep up. 'Mada has a little more low end grunt, but runs out of breath a little most in the higher revs.

Mada is 1000 lbs heavier than the Pathfinder - almost 1/3rd heaver, so the fact that the weight cancels out the extra power shouldn't come as a big surprise.
I was just going to respond to that with the same answer, thanks for copying my thought.

BTW, here's a post I made with this thought in mind with the Titan vs. Frontier at TitanTalk.com

Going by Car and Drivers Titan and Pathfinder performance, My Titan would be as slow as Pathfinder because I added ~150 lbs of accessories as hitch, tonneau cover, and side steps. Without those, Car and Driver's test was 7.3 sec. to 60 mph and 15.7 sec. to the 1/4 mile. The Pathfinder was 7.5 sec. to 60 mph and 15.9 sec. to the 1/4 mile. Like I said, add the additional weight I had to the Titan and they're about the same performance. Now the Armada is actually 350 lbs heavier than the Titan so it's obvious it'll be slower than the Pathfinder even though it will have a better torque output.

As far as the looks, I really disliked the Armada. It looked like 2 vehicles slapped together. I did however love the looks of the Titan.

The Pathfinder to me, looks more tough. It looks more of an Off Roader where the Armada looks more of a tow vehicle. I love the masculine design of the Pathfinder. If they would had kept the Armada with straight lines as the Titan, I would had liked it as well.


Have a good one.

Current
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
with 4.6L V8 w/ 292 Hp and 300 lbs of torque; tow rating of 7000 lbs trailer weight & 730 lbs tongue weight; Base Payload of 1400 lbs and Useable Payload of 1220 lbs. after Hard Tonneau Cover, Built In Bedliner, Side Step Rails, Tow Package and Interior Vehicle Options. More Capability than my Titan with a soft Tonneau (Tow 6500#/650#; Useable Payload 1213#) .


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Gone!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Click on Pic

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Mike Up; 12-08-2005 at 01:10 AM.
Mike Up is offline  
post #7 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2005, 08:19 AM
SHIFT_Hardcore
 
92TripleBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I think it is what it should be. A performance option would be nice, like the SRT Grand Cherokee, but isn't necessary. Nissan is a business after all.




Lowered SUVs are Beneath me. W in '04. Thank me!

'05 Armada LE 4x4, Red Brawn, Graphite, Tech, DVD, Terra Grapplers 305-55-20, MB Motoring Express 20x9, 6000k HID lows, Silverstar 9005 highs & 893 fogs, Lund Stainless Steel Bug Shield, Timing advanced 2 degrees
'92 Vette Vert Black,6-Spd,Lots of mods (For Sale)
'04 G35 Sedan-Black,Sport,wing,all opt.
'02 VW Jetta GLS 1.8T (Hers)
'04 Kawi STX-15F JetSki

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
92TripleBlack is offline  
post #8 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2006, 04:12 PM
SHIFT_Hardcore
 
MCmada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 587
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I personally think the Pathfinder's exterior is far too conservative. Nissan should have made its roofline and rear more like the Armada's so it would stand out more. The engine is just OK with 270 HP. Maybe a new engine that is a bit bigger and stronger would benefit it. Other than that I like it. The interior is nice but, I find it too cramped.

2008 Cadillac Escalade ESV
2009 Hyundai Genesis
2009 Nissan Murano
2004 Infiniti QX56
MCmada is offline  
post #9 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2006, 12:30 AM
SHIFT_Hardcore
 
razzlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Up
Now the Armada is actually 350 lbs heavier than the Titan so it's obvious it'll be slower than the Pathfinder even though it will have a better torque output.

As far as the looks, I really disliked the Armada. It looked like 2 vehicles slapped together. I did however love the looks of the Titan.
1) correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the stock Armada quicker than the stock Titan? Also, I think I read one of the uprev posts that mentioned that the Armada was tuned more aggressively than the Titan, at the factory, to balance out the weight dif.

2) which two vehicles? the Titan and...? They were released at the same time so I don't think the Armada was an after thought. I'm cool with you not liking the looks of the mada, I'm just curious about this comment.

3) I think the looks of the pathfinder are right on the money. I don't look at it and think conservative. I look at the entire jeep line-up and think conservative. Nissan has got it goin' on and I'm always supprised that the rest of the world doesn't see it. It keeps the prices low I guess, so that's cool.

~Clay


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

'05 SE 4x4
big tow, dvd, Bose
33" toyo M/Ts on stock 18"s
Injen CAI, PowerAid TBS, Painted Engine Cover
LE Chrome Grill, Chrome Billet Grill Inserts, Chrome Liftgate Trim


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
razzlee is offline  
post #10 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2006, 07:48 PM
SHIFT_Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by razzlee
1) correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the stock Armada quicker than the stock Titan? Also, I think I read one of the uprev posts that mentioned that the Armada was tuned more aggressively than the Titan, at the factory, to balance out the weight dif.

2) which two vehicles? the Titan and...? They were released at the same time so I don't think the Armada was an after thought. I'm cool with you not liking the looks of the mada, I'm just curious about this comment.

3) I think the looks of the pathfinder are right on the money. I don't look at it and think conservative. I look at the entire jeep line-up and think conservative. Nissan has got it goin' on and I'm always supprised that the rest of the world doesn't see it. It keeps the prices low I guess, so that's cool.

The Armada is the same tuning. The Armada is significantly heavier. Nissan re-rated their performance as the new standard came out and the Titan and Armada are rated the same.

Several publications have rated the Pathy a few tenths of a second slower than the Titan in stock form. The trouble for the Titan is that it lacks in stock form compared to the Pathy. It lacks side steps, receiver hitch, bedliner, and bed cover (tonneau/lid/topper). The Pathy doesn't need anything more to be fully functional compared to the Titan I had. When the weight is added to the additions, it equals the performance.

Now having had both, the Pathy does better performance wise from a highway or town road speed than the Titan. It's power is tuned better for road way speeds. The Titan is tuned better for grunt off the starting line. The Titan has better torque ratio but it just doesn't get up and go once going like the Pathy. The Pathy had good torque for towing with it's 4.0L engine but has better HP ratio than Torque where the opposite is true for the Titan. The Titan and Armada are geared more for heavier loads.

I've only read of one test with the Armada and it was timed faster than the Titan but that was only one test compared to the several I've read for the Titan and Pathy. Since the Armada doesn't need any additional items as the Titan does for functionality, I'd have to believe it offers the same performance as the Pathy but strong in off line performance and weaker with road performance as I found with the Titan and Pathy.

Regardless, they all offer great performance.

What I really didn't like in design on the Armada was the arc in the roofline. I still am in disbelief that they went so radical on that design. I simply don't like it. It looks to pieced together and the lines don't flow for a simplistic, and natural look. Some like this unorthodox design, I hate it. It wouldn't keep me from buying it as nothing is designed perfect as individual tastes are different. The Pathy is as perfect to a design as I like. I also like the old 4Runners and not so much the newer ones. Loved my 2000 Xterra but have mixed feeling on the looks of the new Xterra. Still love the look of the Titan if only they'd let it grow up and get at least a 6.5' bed on the crew cab. 8' bed would be excellent and have it compete with the 1/2 ton 1500 Dodge Ram Crew Cab, 8' bed version.

Have a good one.

Current
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
with 4.6L V8 w/ 292 Hp and 300 lbs of torque; tow rating of 7000 lbs trailer weight & 730 lbs tongue weight; Base Payload of 1400 lbs and Useable Payload of 1220 lbs. after Hard Tonneau Cover, Built In Bedliner, Side Step Rails, Tow Package and Interior Vehicle Options. More Capability than my Titan with a soft Tonneau (Tow 6500#/650#; Useable Payload 1213#) .


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Gone!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Click on Pic

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Mike Up is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome