92TripleBlack· Premium Member
2004 problems. No more fit, finish, rattle, etc. All fixed. Also, now we have available backup camera and new brakes on the way. I looked heavily at: H2, Yukon Denali XL, Escalade, Navigator, Sequoia, and some pickups. Test drives, pricing, fit and finish, etc. The Armada fits me because: Sequoia isn't full size. My '95 Grand Cherokee had the same tow rating. GM stuff wasn't built as well, cost more, slower, and except for the Yukon, I didn't care for the looks. H2 was too small interior wise. Ford was a dog and cost more. Nissan was the fastest in the class, towed as much as any others, most ground clearance, and I like the interior. Saved a few bucks to boot and now I can kick the tails of all the above, and my buddies BMW 325 also.jjwhelan said:I live in the Baltimore / Wash DC area and I am actively looking for a full size SUV. To date the Armada seems to have everything I am looking for, good looks, loads of room, great tech package, etc. However, I have been reading in the Edmunds forums that there are some serious brake and fit and finish problems with the Armada. Are these being overblown? Am I just hearing the whiners? What do you guys think?
If I decide to go with Armada, has anyone dealt with an especially good dealer between Baltimore and DC?